Defendant was charged and found responsible of first-degree animal cruelty with a home violence designation and also two sentencing aggravators. On enchantment, the Court of Appeals vacated the domestic violence designation and the impact on others sentence aggravator. On attraction here, the Supreme Court discovered that animal cruelty might be designated a criminal offense of domestic violence. The statute defining domestic violence has a non-exhaustive record of what crimes can constitute domestic violence. While animal cruelty is not listed, the court found that testament of defendant’s prior controlling behavior coupled with analysis displaying how abusers use violence towards their victims’ pets to control and terrorize victims was adequate. As to the sentencing aggravator, the courtroom found that defendant’s actions had a damaging and foreseeable impression on the witnesses who noticed the animal cruelty.

If you have created an account with us under any of our sites, we might ship you …